Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Essay --The Things They Carried

Read, discuss and evaluate the following student essay. Post a comment regarding your observations.
What is strong about the following student essay?  What needs to be strengthened or revised?

NYS ELA criteria:    Meaning, Development, Organization, Language, Conventions

USE OF TEXT-BASED QUOTES

MLA STYLE

from BookRags:

The Things They Carried: Coping With Death

Summary: Discusses the Tim O'Brien book, The Things They Carried. Examines how O'Brien conveys his approach to death, coping skills, and the loss of his childhood friend, Linda. Reveals how O'Brien used his coping skills in the Vietnam War.

Death is one of life's most challenging obstacles. Tim O'Brien was exposed to more than his fair share of death. To manage the emotional stress, he developed methods of coping with the death in his life. O'Brien's novel, The Things They Carried, demonstrates his attempts to make death less real through psychotherapeutic tactics like telling stories about the dead as if they were living and conceiving the dead as items instead of people.
O'Brien explains how the stories told about those who have passed are meant to keep the deceased's life alive. The "weight of memory" was one thing all the solders carried (14). When added to the physical weight of their gear and the emotional burdens of war, it was all too much. In response, the men altered their perceptions of the truth in order to lighten the haunting weight of memory. O'Brien suggests "in a true war story nothing is ever absolutely true," memory is altered to compensate for its weight (82). In this way, O'Brien, and the rest of the men, were able to utilize "story-truth (179)." Stories alter truth; therefore, a well-told story can actually allow the dead to continue to live on. "In a story, the dead sometimes smile and sit up and return to the world (225)." In this way you could "keep the dead alive" with "blatant lies, bringing the body and soul back together (239)." O'Brien remembers listening to a story about Curt Lemon. He recalls how "you'd never know that Curt Lemon was dead (240)." It seemed like "he was still out there in the dark" yet, "he was dead (240)." Similarly O'Brien uses story to save his childhood friend's life, "not her body - her life (236)." In his stories Linda "can smile and sit up. She can reach out (236)." He allows her to come to life and "touch [his] wrist and [say], "Timmy, stop crying." (238)." O'Brien and the rest of the men are able to find a comfort in the unreal that the real cannot offer.

The solders in Vietnam were able to eliminate the reality of death through predictable responses (20). One response was to "call [death] by other names (21)." "If it isn't human, it doesn't matter much if it's dead . . . a VC nurse, fired by napalm, was a crisp critter. A Vietnamese baby, which lay nearby, was a roasted peanut (238-239)." This detachment made death easier to handle. Furthering the illusion that the dead were not really people, the men would interact with the corpses on a very dehumanizing level. For example, there was a corpse of an old man in a small town. "Dave Jensen went over and shook the old man's hand" and said "How-dee-doo (226)." " One by one the others did too (226)." They all shook the corpse's hand, except O'Brien. O'Brien did not touch the body because for him death was still real. He admits it was "Way too real (226)." He had not yet acquired the survival technique of distancing one's self from the reality of death.

The actuality of war in Vietnam required that the solders have coping techniques in order to retain any mental stability. War was death. "There were a million ways to die. Booby traps and land mines and gangrene and shock and polio from a VC virus (197)." The solders "carried the emotional baggage of men who might die" at any moment (21). "Ted Lavender was shot in the head on his way back from peeing (12)." "The dead were everywhere . . . some in piles" that "proximity to death" changes a person (242, 81). The men needed to develop these coping skills of distancing and selective memory in order to remain sane. "When a man died, there had to be blame" and it was always everyone's fault; yet, no one could handle the soul responsibility (176-177). Often times you held someone's life in your own two hands and were forced to live with the blame if you let go (150). If you were unable to delude yourself as to the reality of death and your part in it, terrible emotional stress was the result. "Lieutenant Cross found himself trembling . . . He felt shame. He hated himself . . . he burned the two photographs" that distracted him, seemingly causing the mistake that killed his solder, he "couldn't burn the blame (16-23)." The guilt and responsibility would destroy the solders if they did not practice coping techniques.

"War is hell . . . war is mystery terror and adventure and courage and discovery and despair and . . . war is nasty (80)." When it all happened it was not like "a movie you aren't a hero and all you can do is whimper and wait (211)." O'Brien and the rest of the solders were just ordinary people thrust into extraordinary situations. They needed to tell blatant lies" to "bring the body and soul back together (239)." They needed to eliminate the reality of death. As ordinary people they were not capable of dealing with the engulfing realities of death and war therefore they needed to create coping skills. O'Brien approaches the loss of his childhood friend, Linda, in the same way he approaches the loss of his comrades in the war as this is the only way he knows how to deal with death. A skill he learned, and needed, in the Vietnam War.

HUNTER COLLEGE READING/WRITING CENTER
THE WRITING PROCESS
Invention: Five Qualities of Good Writing
     What is good writing?  This is not an easy question to
answer.  Many very different kinds of writing are considered
"good" and for many different reasons.  There is no formula or
program for writing well.  However, there are certain qualities
that most examples of good writing share.  The following is a
brief description of five important qualities of good writing. 
The qualities described here are especially appropriate for
academic and expository writing.  



         FIVE IMPORTANT QUALITIES OF GOOD WRITING

Writing should have focus:         An essay should have a single
                                   clear central idea.  Each
                                   paragraph should have a clear
                                   main point or topic sentence.

Writing should have development:   Each paragraph should support
                                   the central idea of the paper.
                                   Individual sentences should
                                   support the main point of the
                                   paragraph.   

Writing should have unity:         Every paragraph in an essay
                                   should be related to the main
                                   idea.  Each paragraph should
                                   stick to its main point.

Writing should have coherence:     An essay or paper should be
                                   organized logically, flow
                                   smoothly, and "stick"
                                   together.

                                   In other words, everything in
                                   the writing should make sense
                                   to a reader.

Writing should have correctness:   A paper should be written in
                                   generally correct standard
                                   English, with complete
                                   sentences, and be relatively
                                   error-free.

     One additional quality, not part of this list, but
nevertheless, very important, is creativity.  The best writing is
that which carries some of the personality, the individuality of
its author.  Follow the above guidelines, but always strive above
all to make your writing uniquely your own.

17 comments:

  1. The intro paragraph could be a little smoother, with fewer short choppy sentences and more that are longer and more complete thoughts. The thesis doesn't agree with my personal opinion, but it is otherwise a well function introductory paragraph with a good hook. There are a grammar and spelling mistakes throughout the essay; instead of making it easier to read, the punctuation and grammar makes the writing confusing. You can tell the writer has significant ideas, but they get muddled by the quotes. Its not that they use to many, they just don't elaborate on them and don't explain well enough its purpose in developing his argument. The choppy-ness in the first paragraph continues throughout the essay, many short, blunt, generic sentences and fewer longer and more complex thoughts. His sentences get the job done, but don't flow together in a way that is attractive to the reader. Each paragraphs could be a little more focused on one central idea that directly supports the thesis.

    Altogether, this was not a bad essay, but there is room for improvement mechanically as well as creatively. To me, it was a little dry. Plus it makes it harder for me to enjoy reading it because of our conflicting opinions. Still a rather good essay though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The introduction to the essay is very nice. It introduces the ideas of the essay. The author interprets O'brien's writing in their own way.
    The intro also has a thesis to show what they will be writing about.
    The essay focus' on death and how O'Brien copes with his experience in the war. In my opinion the author used too many quotes. There were so many quotes it seemed like they didnt fully develop the ideas.
    Ahmed, Maddie, Neriah

    ReplyDelete
  3. meaning: The meaning of this essay is clear, the author remains on focus and supports his opinion with in text citations from the book
    However, i did find that that certain paragraphs didnt "stick" together, there was a lack of flow because too many quotes were given-often without a further expansion on it.
    development: Development was evident, with many examples to support the claims made. Even though I didn't particularity agree with everything that was written, it was a well written essay. The intro was very concise, it was on point and had a great thesis.
    language: The language in this essay is strong, there is no additional quality of creativeness-the tone is formal and informative.
    organization: I think it was organized well, it had more than five paragraphs, the introduction had a great hook sentence, concise, strong thesis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jamichael Frazier: overall, the essay was good. The essay was greatly organized, they had five or so paragraphs and the student had developed the essay well, they didn't go off topic and i was able too understand the essay the whole time. The student also had a strong intro to their essay, it made me realize how to write a better intro.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This was a perfectly well written essay. The meaning is clear and focused. The writer developed the essay well and organized it into a concise introduction, supporting body paragraphs, and conclusion. The author use many quotes, perhaps a few too many, as evidence to support his or her thesis. Stylistically, this essay is well written, using conventions and appropriate language.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The essay is rather well written, but I think it relies too heavily on quotes. The majority of the essay is quote after quote. There isn't much elaboration by the writer. There are also a few typos, but that's a minor issue. The meaning is clearly developed using the quotes, and the hook is wonderfully done. It flows fluidly, but I accredit that to the fact that quotes were thrown everywhere. Overall, well done, but it's basically just a reading parts of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought this essay was pretty good even though I disagreed strongly with the central point that the author was attempting to make about O'Brien's perspective on death. However, the writer was able to effectively manipulate quotes from the book so that they supported his or her thesis. I personally would have preferred less quotes, they create a fragmented structure and inhibit the essay and the author's idea from flowing smoothly. Every time a quote is inserted, the reader is wrenched out of the tone of the author's main idea and thrust into the voice of O'Brien's prose.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Maya&Dayanara

    we think that this is a nice essay, and it makes the point. But one main problem with it is that there is an over usage of quotes. Some of the quotes are used in the right spots, and have good meaning but a good amount of them are replacing the words that the writer could have said without quotation marks. The organization side of the essay was nice, and the writer managed not to get off topic at all. the meaning of this essay was clear and focused. The development was strong, there were many examples to explain the writers thoughts. The language is strong, not very creative, but it gets the point across.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Liam & Will
    The author of this essay used the quotes from the novel too often to make them effective. Instead of presenting his own ideas in his own words he relied too heavily on the quotes from the novel to make his point for him. Quotes should be used to re-enforce your ideas, not state your ideas to the reader.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The essay was well organized, the paragraphs all supported the main idea. Although there was some minor repetition. The writer used too many quotes, and did not use his opinion as much as he could have. The writer also should have exemplified his own ideas rather than referring to the book for most of the support.

    Otis/Patrick

    ReplyDelete
  11. This was a very well written essay. However they make the mistake of using too many quotes. The reader want to know what the writer is like but they did not put any of themselves in the paper. They also put the page numbers in the quotes which is incorrect. Other than that it was a pretty good essay. this person just needs to work on flowing and creativity. The intro was very good at getting the point of the essay across.
    ~sophie, michaela

    ReplyDelete
  12. This essayist really likes to use quotes, I mean A LOT. Some sentences are "quote" therefore "quote" and "quote." It lacks the writers own opinions, it just summarizes and uses O'Brien's own opinions from the book. They also aren't using MLA citation correctly, which might just be a mistake, but they also make a few big mistakes with their quotation marks and spelling. Their intro is strong, even if I don't really agree with their thesis statement. I dont think they really follow through with it either, again because of their over use of quotes. I might not be fully understanding the book but I don't think that they really understand the book if they say that Tim O'Brien is making his dead characters into 'items.'

    ReplyDelete
  13. This essay is just okay. The student's own ideas and voice is missing. There are a lot of quotes and they muddle the focus on what their topic is, making it so that you are reading a lot of what the book itself already tells you, rather than coming up with your own original words. Also, the formatting for the MLA in-text quotes are not quite right. The ideas that the author is trying to get across, esp in the intro are pretty clear and fit with the title.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The essay is clear and concise but is void of any voice or style, and repeats the central message to redundancy. The writer shows a clear understanding of the theme of death in "The Things they carried", and his thesis is very well supported by the examples of coping with death in the book. However, the essay doesn't flow so well and feels a bit clunky from being littered with direct quotes. Also, he repeats his thesis far too many times when the textual evidence he uses is good enough.

    ReplyDelete
  15. i think this is a beautifully written essay, but i agree with caleb, it is a bit over-quoted. There are also a few spelling errors that i noticed, but other than that it was an extremely organized and perfect length. it also discusses the theme extremely well.
    -Ariyuanna , Jack Demetrius.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think the author's idea's were clouded by the incredible amount of quotes used. The ideas he's trying to get across are very clear, but are undeveloped. This essay would have benefitted from more original ideas being thrown in, and less quotes being used.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The essay had a clear focus, and was developed in a mostly understandable way. Unfortunately, the author dramatically overused quotes from the book, resulting in an essay that doesn't flow nearly as smoothly as it should. They drown their very own ideas, points, and thoughts in needless quotation. Regarding accuracy, the essay was nearly flawless, but there are a handful of grammar and spelling errors, along with noticeable general laziness in sentence construction.

    ReplyDelete