Group One (Speaking
of Courage):
(1) To begin with, why is this story called "Speaking
of Courage"? Assume the title does NOT hold any irony. In what sense does
this story speak of courage?
(2) Why does Norman Bowker still feel
inadequate with seven metals? And why is Norman's father such a presence in his
mental life? Would it really change Norman's life if he had eight metals, the
silver star, etc.?
(3) What is the more difficult problem
for Norman--the lack of the silver star or the death of Kiowa? Which does he
consider more and why?
(5) Why is Norman unable to relate to
anyone at home? More importantly, why doesn't he even try?
Group Two (Notes):
(6) In "Notes," Tim O'Brien receives a letter from
Norman Bowker, the main character in "Speaking of Courage." Why does
O'Brien choose to include excerpts of this seventeen page letter in this book?
What does it accomplish?
(7) Consider for a moment that the letter
might be made-up, a work of fiction. Why include it then?
(8) In "Notes," Tim O'Brien
says, "You start sometimes with an incident that truly happened, like the
night in the shit field, and you carry it forward by inventing incidents that
did not in fact occur but that nonetheless help to clarify and explain
it." What does this tell you about O'Brien's understanding of the way
fiction relates to real life?
Compare and contrast possible versions of Kiowa's death in Speaking of Courage and the end of "Notes". Who is responsible?
Group Three (In the Field):
1. Explain why the following people feel they are
to blame for Kiowa’s death?
Lt. Jimmy Cross
The young soldier searching the field for his girlfriend’s
picture
Tim O’Brien
Discuss O'Brien's comment
that, "When a man died, there had to be blame" (198).
What, in the end, is the
significance of the shitfield story (or stories)?
No comments:
Post a Comment