Friday, February 28, 2014

The Real Thing

Happy Friday, everyone!











AGENDA:

1. House keeping.

All you need to know about Literary Criticism!
Final Essay Prompts
Final Essay Grading Rubric
Group Presentation Guidelines and Rubric

2. We will be having a discussion about Henry James' "The Real Thing"

With its ironic examination of the relationship between representations and reality, “The Real Thing” can serve as an excellent jumping-off point for a discussion of realism as an artistic movement. The story serves as a kind of fable about the artistic production of realistic representation. The reader, along with the artist in the story, comes to realize that it is precisely because the Monarchs represent British aristocratic values that they fail as models of the type. Artistic inspiration seems to depend on artificiality and pretense (figured by the lower-class models) and is hampered by the stifling presence of the “real thing.”

  • Think about the implications of James’s fable about the making of realistic art.
  • What is the relationship between the artist and reality?
  • What seems to be the goal of the “realist” art object?
  • What is the relationship between the artist in the story and Henry James, the writer?


HOMEWORK:
1. Finish up your novels and be prepared for out last LC meeting on Monday.
2. Finish working on your group presentation! We will be presenting Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.
3. Work on your final paper! It is due next Friday.
4. Turn in any late work you are missing!!

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Marxist Criticism

Good afternoon, everyone!

AGENDA:

1. Handout essay prompts

2. Finish Socialism .vs. Capitalism debate

3. "The Real Thing" by Henry James

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Marxist Criticism

Good afternoon, everyone!!

AGENDA:

1. Prezi of Marxist Literary Criticism


2. Socialism .vs. Capitalism debate

Monday, February 24, 2014

Lit Circles #2 & #3

Good afternoon, everyone! Welcome back from break!! I don't know about you, but this is how I felt this morning...











AGENDA:

1. House keeping & missing work.

2. Take about 5-7 minutes to correct your answers to the AP Packet that Ms. Gamzon handed out to you before break. Once you're done, please turn these in so we can give you credit for them.

3. For the rest of the period today and into class tomorrow, you will be n your LC groups discussing the readings that you were supposed to do for the week before and the week of break (2/10-2/14 & 2/17-2/21). You had TWO readings and TWO roles to complete.

http://www.timeanddate.com/timer/#

Friday, February 14, 2014

They Say, I Say/AP Practice

Good afternoon, everyone!! Happy Valentine's Day!!













AGENDA:

1. Review "The Yellow Wallpaper" briefly

2. They Say, I Say Part 2

3. AP Practice

CHAPTER 4: THREE WAYS TO RESPOND

  •  Agree--But With a Difference
    • You need to do more than simply echo the views that you agree with; bring something new and fresh to the conversation.
    • Open up some difference or contrast between your position and the one you're agreeing with.
      • Point out unnoticed implications.
      • Explain something that needs to be better understood.
    • Remember: When you agree with one person, you are disagreeing with someone else.
  • Disagree--And Explain Why
    • You need to do more than simply say you disagree with a particular view; you have to offer persuasive reasons for why you disagree.
    • Demonstrate that you have something to contribute to the conversation.
    • "Duh" move = disagreeing not with the position itself, but the assumption that is new.
    • "Twist it" move = agree with the evidence that someone else has presented, but show through  twist of logic that the evidence actually supports your own, contrary position.
  • Qualifying (Agree and Disagree)
    • Goes beyond and "is too/ is not" exchange.
    • Keeps argument complex.
    • You can tip towards agreement or disagreement depending on where you lay your stress.
CHAPTER 7: SAYING WHY IT MATTERS

  • Answering the "who cares?" and "so what?" questions in your own writing.
  • "Who cares?"
    • Identify an interested person or group.
    • Establish a type of contrast between what others say and what you say.
    • Use of dramatic tension or clash of views helps your readers feel invested in what you are saying.
  • "So what?"
    • Link your argument to some larger matter that your readers already believe to be important.
    • Hook your readers.
    • Give real-world application of your claims.
    • Frame it in a way that helps the reader care about it.

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Why I wrote the Yellow Wallpaper


“The Yellow Wallpaper” is an exaggerated account of Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s personal experiences. In 1887, shortly after the birth of her daughter, Gilman began to suffer from serious depression and fatigue. She was referred to Silas Weir Mitchell, a leading specialist in women’s nervous disorders in the nineteenth century, who diagnosed Gilman with neurasthenia and prescribed a “rest cure” of forced inactivity. Weir Mitchell believed that nervous depression was a result of overactive nerves and ordered Gilman to cease all forms of creative activity, including writing, for the rest of her life. The goal of the treatment was to promote domesticity and calm her agitated nerves.Gilman attempted to endure the “rest cure” treatment and did not write or work for three months. Eventually, she felt herself beginning to go slowly insane from the inactivity and, at one point, was reduced to crawling under her bed holding a rag doll. Unlike the protagonist in her story, Gilman did not reach the point of total madness, but she knew that her deteriorating mental condition was due to the oppressive medical regime that was meant to “cure” her. She abandoned Mitchell’s advice and moved to California in order to overcome her depression on her own. Although Gilman’s attempt was successful, she claimed to suffer from post-traumatic stress from Weir Mitchell’s treatment for the rest of her life. In 1890, Gilman wrote “The Yellow Wallpaper” in an effort to save other women from suffering the same oppressive treatment. Weir Mitchell and his treatment play a key role in the narrative; in the third section of the text, the protagonist’s husband even threatens to send her to Weir Mitchell in the fall if she does not recover soon.
In 1890, Gilman sent the story to writer William Dean Howells, who submitted it to Horace Scudder, editor of the prestigious magazine, “The Atlantic Monthly.” Scudder rejected the story as depressing material, and returned it to Gilman with a handwritten note that read: “Dear Madam: W. Howells has handed me this story. I could not forgive myself if I made others as miserable as I have made myself! Sincerely Yours, H. E. Scudder.” Eventually the story was published in “The New England Magazine” in May 1892. According to Gilman’s autobiography, she sent a copy of “The Yellow Wallpaper” to Weir Mitchell after its publication. Although she never received a response, she claimed that Weir Mitchell later changed his official treatment for nervous depression as a direct result of her story. Gilman also asserted that she knew of one particular woman who had been spared the “rest cure” as a treatment for her depression after her family read “The Yellow Wallpaper.”
The public reaction to the story was strong, if mixed. In many circles, “The Yellow Wallpaper” was perceived as nothing more than a horror story, stemming from the gothic example of Edgar Allen Poe and Mary Shelley. It was not until the 1970s that the story was also recognized as a feminist narrative worthy of historical and literary scholarship.


Why I Wrote “The Yellow Wallpaper”
By Charlotte Perkins Gilman, as it appeared in The Forerunner, October 1913

Many and many a reader has asked that.  When the story first came out, in the New England Magazine about 1891, a Boston physician made protest in The Transcript.  Such a story ought not to be written, he said; it was enough to drive anyone mad to read it.

Another physician, in Kansas I think, wrote to say that it was the best description of incipient insanity he had ever seen, and, begging my pardon, had I been there?

Now the story of the story is this:

For many years I suffered from a severe and continuous nervous breakdown tending to melancholia and beyond.  During about the third year of this trouble I went, in devout faith and some faint stir of hope, to a noted specialist in nervous diseases, the best known in the country.  This wise man put me to bed and applied the rest cure, to which a still-good physique responded so promptly that he concluded there was nothing much the matter with me, and sent me home with solemn advice to “live as domestic life as far as possible,” to “have but two hours intellectual life a day,” and “never to touch pen, or pencil again” as long as I lived.  This was in 1887.

I went home and obeyed those directions for some three months, and came so near the borderline of utter mental ruin that I could see over.

Then, using the remnants of intelligence that remained, and helped by a wise friend, I cast the noted specialist’s advice to the winds and went to work again – work, the normal life of every human being; work, in which is joy and growth and service, without which one is a pauper and a parasite – ultimately recovering some measure of power.

Being naturally moved to rejoicing by this narrow escape, I wrote, “The Yellow Wallpaper,” with its embellishments and additions, to carry out the ideal (I never had hallucinations or objections to my mural decorations) and sent a copy to the physician who so nearly drove me mad.  He never acknowledged it.

The little book is valued by alienists and as a good specimen of one kind of literature.   It has, to my knowledge, saved one woman from a similar fate so terrifying her family that they let her out into normal activity and she recovered.

But the best result is this.  Many years later I was told that the great specialist had admitted to friends of his that he had altered his treatment of neurasthenia since reading “The Yellow Wallpaper.”

It was not intended to drive people crazy, but to save people from being driven crazy, and it worked.

With a partner or two:  write your thoughts about each of the underlined words in the article by Gilman.  If you don’t know what a word means (like neurasthenia) look it up!!  Be prepared to share with the class.

Mad:

Incipient Insanity:

Nervous Breakdown:

Melancholia:

Nervous Diseases:

Mental Ruin:

Neurasthenia:

Crazy:


The Yellow Wallpaper

Good afternoon, everyone!!

It's......










AGENDA:

1. Discuss "The Yellow Wallpaper" by Charlotte Perkins Gillman

  • What did you think of the story? The main character?
  • What was your impression/interpretation of the ending?
  • What tenets of Freud or Jung could you find?
2. Watch the last scene of "The Yellow Wallpaper"
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWJ4ZtLlRvE&list=PLA9B79A6592B5414C&index=2

If you are interested in watching the entire PBS Masterpiece Theater production, here is the link to the playlist on Youtube.
     The Yellow Wallpaper

HOMEWORK:

Please do a blog post looking at the last scene of "The Yellow Wallpaper", comparing and contrasting how it is depicted in the film clip we watched and how Gillman depicts it in her short story.

  • What is gained or lost by this film adaptation?
  • Which version do you think highlights the main character's instability/insanity more?
  • How does the film version enhance or lessen the creepy and disturbing effect of the original story?
  • Did seeing the film version affect your interpretation of the main character and the ending of the story? Why or why not?